So what would be more perfect than these gorgeous, gorgeous shoes? The only problem is that they are nearly $300. Is it worth it? Should I just wear the white heels I already own?
Voila! Pair number 1- Badgley Mischka Carlo Pump in pink...so gorgeous!
Or perhaps even better...pair number 2 with fantastic detail and a great rosey-peach color.
So what do you say ladies, number 1, number 2 or the white shoes I already own?
Posts
If I could walk in them, I would totally wear the first pair!
ReplyDeleteI like splurging on pretty pink things, so I'm probably the wrong person to ask about spending $300.
I'm really digging #1. Would you ever wear them again?! Maybe there's an option #3 that is just as cute and a little less $$. I think it will make you feel great wearing a new pair of shoes!
ReplyDeleteIs it wrong that I think you should buy both? ;)
ReplyDeleteI'm such a shoe whore...so I know this can't be an easy decision!
I LOOOOVE shoe #2. Sexy, and a bit of that retro vibe....
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I couldn't justify that much for a pair of shoes, when I could spend it toward my honeymoon or put it in savings. But, that's just my two cents! :)
What do I know? I wore flip flops! Haha
The upside of being able to afford none of them (like me): surrounding yourself with pictures of ALL of them.
ReplyDeleteNumber 1!! And those are un-wedding-y enough that you could definitely wear them again and again.
ReplyDeleteI figure, your wedding is already costing you so much money, what's one more thing. Although, I use that excuse about life in NYC in general, so perhaps that is faulty logic.
#2!!! plus, you could totally wear them again!
ReplyDeleteOh my gosh, there is noooo question. You need #1 for the ceremony, and #2 for the reception! Tell Mr. L that if he doesn't buy your four shoes, you will never bear sons.
ReplyDelete